567
97
96.
the
declarations of those of same blood, it was constantly, as Mr. Phillips .. (Law of "hed: page 242) has shown, the practice to receive the hearsays of
Evidence 8th ed:
tradition," and
servants, of
casual acquaintances leven of "common fame", "general 6 reputation of the county, in proof, & lepon such proof to defeat
oi establish the descent or
consanguinity of the party although those
were the were,
principal or even
bov even the only
matters at issue in the cause
And, albeit limited in that
respect since 1824., the like evidence is still admissible in all other cases to establish the like facts.
•
"Her... says Mr. Ditt Taylor,. (Law of Evidence), 2nded, pp. 454-5..) - " it does not follow "that, because the writings
or words in question are those of a third person not under "bath, they are thereforesto "" be considered as hearsay. On the contrary, it often happens "that the very fact in " controversy is, whether certain
" things
were written.
رم
spoken, and not who ther
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.